My daughter was also born by *C-SECTION* on Dec 5, 2007.?
My daughter was also born by *C-SECTION* on Dec 5, 2007. However, didn't have the perfect little round egg shpaed head. She was born with what it seems as brachy symptoms - flat in the back and wide on the sides of her head. This is probably due to my restrictive uterius. Now being that she will be 3 months in a week, I went to a cranial clinician for treatment since her head shape hasn't gone away. The Cephalic Index norm is supposed to be 2.0. The results were that my daughter has a Cephalic Index of +4.71 (ratio of the maximum width of the head to its maximum length ((i.e., in the horizontal plane, or front to back), sometimes multiplied by 100 for convenience.)) I'm very concern and don't want to just brush this under the rug. This is the time to do something about it. I'm just worried that Kaiser Insurance will not cover her theraputic support $ - such as a head band/cast.
HAS ANYONE DEALT WITH KAISER INSURANCE FOR SUCH AN ISSUE AS MINE?
Posted in round rug
content rss
June 4th, 2010 at 9:29 pm
I knew someone who had this problem also. They took there baby to a pediatric massage therapist whom manipulated there baby’s head back to shape over a series of sessions. It was much cheaper for them to do it that way plus it was efficient. You should look into it.
But to answer your question, no, i have never dealt with that insurance. Good Luck to you though.
June 4th, 2010 at 9:29 pm
My daughter was born DEC 5Th 07 as well at kaiser. Sorry I have no experience w/ this situation but check w/ member services, and they should be able tell you. Usually if this issues affects the child’s well being the doctors can indicate that and insurances pay.There is always loop holes in every system that we can use to our advantage…we just have to be extremely persistent about finding them. Don’t stop until you get the answer you want.